FC5398

Single Column View
Aircraft doors and slides

At the operator with whom I am employed it is common practice for dead-head rated, and not-rated on type crew (i.e. non-operating crew who are positioning to, or from a station) to offer help with the arm/disarm and close/open of the aircraft doors, and in rare instances, to complete exterior inspection. [As] they are not on duty, and it might be, that their headspace and operational arousal level might differ from that of an operating crew member. The CHIRP report is then to establish if a type rated, yet non-FDP off duty, yet on company time crew member, can reasonably or legally take part in such safety critical functions such as the exterior inspection walk-around and/or the arming disarming opening/closing of aircraft doors. My concern rests with the liabilities and fallout should an injury so result from a slide deployment, of a not on duty crew member carrying out the tasks, of an on duty crew member such as an exterior inspection and or an inadvertent potentially lethal slide deployment and how this might develop legally in the case of the regulator, or legislation, or a court of law. I thank you for your time and guidance.

Most colleagues, most of the time, will try and be helpful in such circumstances, particularly when close knit airline teams are involved. However, it’s important to emphasise that agreeing to help other colleagues isn’t always the right decision. There are clear implications regarding liability if a non-operating crew member carries out safety of flight duties, such as operating doors or undertaking walk round pre-flight checks, and something was to go wrong. However, in contrast, there is nothing to stop an airline asking a non-operating crew member, who happens to be on board for positioning for example, to be formally called in on duty to help the operating crew. CHIRP believes that the flight should be able to be operated safely with the assigned operating crew on board and not need the assistance of positioning crew. This report was a good example of how normalisation of deviance can erode safety margins. Non-operating crew trying to be helpful will, over time, result in operations shifting towards non-standard or procedures contrary to regulations. And if this happens, where now is the boundary?

The airline was not contacted at the behest of the reporter.